综合干预对脑损伤高危儿神经发育的研究

章恒; 蒋新液; 卫雅蓉

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-12-33

PDF(435 KB)

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (12) : 1334-1336. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-12-33

经验交流

综合干预对脑损伤高危儿神经发育的研究

章恒,蒋新液,卫雅蓉

作者信息 +

Study of comprehensive intervention on nervous development of high-risk neonate with brain damage.

ZHANG Heng,JIANG Xin-ye,WEI Ya-rong.

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨综合干预对脑损伤高危儿神经系统发育的影响和干预时效性。方法选择脑损伤高危儿,按照干预依从性原则,分为非干预组和干预组。干预组又根据干预时间窗分为新生儿期干预组(A组)、婴儿期干预组(B组)和幼儿期干预组(C组),同时选择同期出生的正常婴幼儿为对照组(E组)。分析不同组别婴幼儿运动、智能和神经发育结局。结果新生儿期干预组除生后1周NBNA评分低于正常对照组外,各运动发育的建立时间、智能和神经发育水平均接近正常对照组。而各运动发育的建立时间评价发现,干预组优于非干预组,且新生儿期和婴儿期干预效果优于幼儿期干预组;智能低下和脑瘫的发生率比较发现,干预组优于非干预组(D组),且新生儿期和婴幼儿干预效果优于幼儿期干预组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脑损伤一定程度上导致婴幼儿运动、智能和神经发育损伤,而综合干预有明显改善效果,干预时间越早效果越好。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of comprehensive intervention on nervous development and timeliness of intervention for high risk infant with brain damage. Methods High risk infant with brain damage were divided into intervention and non-intervention groups according to compliance principle.The intervention groups were divided into intervention group of neonatal period(group A),intervention group of infancy period(group B) and intervention group of early childhood(group C) according to the different intervention time,while normal infants born in the same period selected as the control group(group E).The differences of movement,intelligence and neurodevelopment outcomes were analyzed. Results Except the NBNA score of group A was less than that of group E in the first week,there were similar with the levels of movement,intelligence and neurodevelopment outcomes between group A and group E.Evaluations of motor development,ratios of low intelligence and cerebral palsy were indicated that the effect of intervention group was better than non-intervention group(group D),the results of group A and group B were also better than those in group C(P<0.05). Conclusion Brain damage can lead to damage of movement,intelligent and neurodevelopment of infant to a certain extent.Comprehensive intervention have the improving results and the earlier is better.

导出引用

章恒,蒋新液,卫雅蓉. 综合干预对脑损伤高危儿神经发育的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2014, 22(12): 1334-1336 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-12-33

ZHANG Heng,JIANG Xin-ye,WEI Ya-rong.. Study of comprehensive intervention on nervous development of high-risk neonate with brain damage.[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2014, 22(12): 1334-1336 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-12-33

中图分类号： R749.94

参考文献

[1] 吴瑞萍,胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社2002.
[2] Banovi

V,Skrablin S,Banovi

M,et al.Fetal brain magnetic resonance imaging and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2014,125(3):237-240.
[3] 鲍秀兰.0～3岁儿童最佳的人生开端-中国宝宝早期教育与潜能开发指南(高危儿卷)[M].北京:中国妇女出版社,2013.
[4] 唐久来.常见中枢性运动发育落后/障碍的规范化诊断[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(7):673-675.
[5] 史俊霞,曾国章.20项新生儿行为神经测定应用研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,16(5):620.
[6] 张立新,徐宝良.52项神经运动检查法在脑瘫筛查中的应用[J].中国妇幼保健,2009,24(32):4607-4608.
[7] 吴卫红,鲍秀兰,席冰玉,等.0～1岁52项神经运动检查和简化20项相关性研究[J].中国儿童保健,2014,22(3):310-312.
[8] Sajo M,Morishita H.Critical period mechanisms;implication for neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders[J].Brain Nerve,2013,65(10):1159-1166.
[9] 王炳高,王守彪,郭云良,等.早期康复训练队缺氧后行为恢复的影响及分子机理[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(3):196-199.
[10] Koldewijn K,van Wassenaer A,Wolf MJ,et al.A neurobehavioral intervention and assessment program in very low birth weight infants;outcome at 24 months[J].J Pediatr,2010,156(3):359-365.
[11] 许平,潘发明.早期干预对脑损伤早产儿神经系统发育的影响[J].安徽医学,2014,35(1):38-41.
[12] 张智香,田恒峰.脑损伤高危儿早期干预效果观察[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2012,37(9):1088-1090.
[13] 郭雯,俞洁,陆峰,等.早期综合干预对高危儿生长发育近期影响的研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2012,27(8):1163-1165.