目的 探讨注意缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)对功能性构音障碍(functional articulation disorders,FAD)语音治疗效果的影响。方法 选择在郑州大学第一附属医院语音治疗科就诊的110例FAD患儿为研究对象,依据DSM-Ⅳ ADHD诊断标准,将同时患有ADHD的FAD患儿分为:注意障碍为主型(predominantly inattentive,I)、多动/冲动为主型(predominantly hyperactive-impulsive,HI)、混合型(combined type,C),比较FAD-I组、FAD-HI组和FAD-C组与单纯FAD组患儿语音治疗前后语音清晰度(PI)的差别。结果 语音治疗前,各组间PI值的差异没有统计学意义(F=1.046,P=0.375);语音治疗后,各组间PI值的差异有统计学意义(F=73.726,P＜0.001)。进一步Q检验结果显示,FAD-I组、FAD-C组PI值低于单纯FAD组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05),单纯FAD组和FAD-HI组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);FAD-HI组PI值高于FAD-I组和FAD-C组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 ADHD的I和C亚型可能会降低FAD的语音治疗效果,或许需要在进行语音治疗的同时采取针对ADHD的相关治疗。
Abstract
Objective To compare the efficacy of speech therapy in children with functional articulation disorder (FAD) with or without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods A total of 110 children diagnosed with FAD were selected as research objects from department of Speech Therapy,the first affiliated hospital,Zhengzhou university.According to whether fulfilled ADHD criteria of DSM-Ⅳ,the children were further divided into 3 subtypes:predominantly inattentive(I,18 cases),predominantly hyperactive-impulsive (HI,12 cases) and combined type (C,22 cases).Then the FAD-I group,the FAD-HI group,the FAD-C group and the non-ADHD group were given the same speech therapy.At last the phonetic intelligibility (PI) of the four groups was compared before and after speech therapy to explore the impact of ADHD on the effect of speech therapy. Results Before speech treatment,there was no statistical significance in differences of PI between groups (F=1.046,P=0.375).After speech treatment,there was a statistical significance in differences of PI between groups (F=73.726,P<0.001).The results of Q test indicated that the PI of the FAD-I group and the FAD-C group were lower than the non-ADHD group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); There was no statistical significance between the differences of the FAD-HI group and the FAD group (P>0.05).The PI of the FAD-HI group was lower than the FAD-I group and the FAD-C group,the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The I and C subtype of ADHD may lower the speech therapy effect of the FAD patients obviously,but the HI subtype is not so obvious.Maybe when implementing the speech therapy,it also needs to take relevant treatment for ADHD at the same time.
关键词
注意缺陷多动障碍 /
功能性构音障碍 /
语音治疗 /
儿童
Key words
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder /
functional articulation disorders /
speech therapy /
child
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王慧,鲍毓,徐琳,等.儿童功能性构音障碍的临床分析及言语治疗[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2011,33(11):835-838.
[2] Thevenon J,Callier P,Andrieux J,et al.12p13.33 microdeletion including ELKS/ERC1,a new locus associated with childhood apraxia of speech[J].Eur J Hum Genet,2013,21(1):82-88.
[3] 赵云静,孙洪伟,麻宏伟,等.功能性构音障碍的临床共患病调查及行为问题研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2009,11(3):225-228.
[4] 王国民,朱川,袁文化,等.汉语语音清晰度测试字表的建立和临床应用研究[J].上海口腔医学,1995,4(3):125-127.
[5] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders[M].4th ed Text Revision (DSM-Ⅳ- TR).Washington,DC:American Psychiatric Association,2000.
[6] Forrest K,Iuzzini J.A comparison of oral motor and production training for children with speech sound disorders[J].Semin Speech Lang,2008,29(4):304-311.
[7] 肖朝华,王庆红,罗甜甜,等.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍共患病及功能损害研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(9):728-732.
[8] Elbro C,Dalby M,Maarbjerg S.Language-learning impairments:a 30-year follow-up of language-impaired children with and without psychiatric,neurological and cognitive difficulties[J].Int J Lang Commun Disord,2011,46(4):437-448.
[9] 刘璐,钱秋谨,李海梅,等.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的空间注意非对称性/偏侧化异常[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,26(6):406-409.
[10] 郭耀光,陈强,周翔,等.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的工作记忆存储特征[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(6):419-423.
[11] 马学梅,赵云静,赵亚茹.注意缺陷多动障碍临床亚型持续性注意力的比较[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(2):136-137.
[12] 张微,刘翔平,王博,等.三种亚型ADHD儿童在停止信号任务上的表现的个案研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(9):601-602.
基金
河南省教育厅科技基金资助项目(2009A320023); 河南省卫生厅科技基金资助项目(201003030)
PDF(451 KB)
