健康教育路径在常见喘息性疾病患儿住院期间的应用效果

李海波, 李鑫, 李丽, 闫晓燕, 孙慧

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7) : 779-781.

PDF(412 KB)
PDF(412 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (7) : 779-781. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-07-37
健康教育

健康教育路径在常见喘息性疾病患儿住院期间的应用效果

  • 李海波, 李鑫, 李丽, 闫晓燕, 孙慧
作者信息 +

Intervention effect of the health education path on common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children.

  • LI Hai-bo, LI Xin, LI Li, YAN Xiao-yan, SUN Hui
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨健康教育路径在小儿常见喘息性疾病患儿住院期间治疗护理中的应用效果, 为改善和促进患儿健康提供科学依据。方法 将2013年1-6月在河北联合大学附属医院儿科住院的200例喘息性疾病患儿, 按单双日分为干预组和对照组, 每组100例。对照组采用传统健康教育方式, 干预组采用健康教育路径, 比较两组患儿的护理效果。结果 干预组患儿住院时间[(5.52±1.26)d]比对照组[(6.53±1.29) d]明显缩短, 吸入方法得分干预组(7.00±1.84)比对照组(5.90±1.98)明显提高, 精神状况(38%)比对照组(25%)有所改善、患儿家长知识掌握度(52%)好于对照组(18%)、护理满意度(80%)亦高于对照组(65%), 差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论 健康教育路径在常见喘息性疾病患儿治疗护理中的应用效果明显, 促进其健康。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application effect of the health education path in common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children, and provide a scientific basis for improving and promoting the health of children. Methods A total of 200 children were randomly divided into intervention and control groups during the period from January to June, 2013.The intervention group were treated by the health education path, while the control group treated by the traditional way of health education.And the effect of the two groups was compared. Results The results of hospitalization of children in the intervention group (5.52±1.26)d was shorter than the control group (6.53±1.29)d, inhalation method score (7.00±1.84) was higher than the control group (5.90±1.98).Mental status (38%) was better than the control group (25%), knowledge level of the parents of children (52%) was higher than the control group (18%), nursing satisfaction (80%) was also higher (65 %) than control group (P=0.000). Conclusion The application effect of the health education path in common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children is obvious, and improving the health of children.

关键词

健康教育路径 / 小儿 / 常见喘息性疾病 / 干预

Key words

health education path / children / common pediatric asthmatic diseases / intervention

引用本文

导出引用
李海波, 李鑫, 李丽, 闫晓燕, 孙慧. 健康教育路径在常见喘息性疾病患儿住院期间的应用效果[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2014, 22(7): 779-781 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-07-37
LI Hai-bo, LI Xin, LI Li, YAN Xiao-yan, SUN Hui. Intervention effect of the health education path on common pediatric asthmatic diseases of children.[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2014, 22(7): 779-781 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2014-22-07-37
中图分类号: R722   

参考文献

[1] Zhao J, Shen KL, Li X, et al.The knowledge, attitudes and practices of parents of children with asthma in 29 cities of China:a multi-center study[J].BMC Pediatrics, 2013, 13:20-30.
[2] Butz AM, Haterman JS.Factors associated with completion of a behavioral intervention for caregivers of urban children with asthma[J].J Asthma, 2012, 49(9):977-988.
[3] 谢健.儿童支气管哮喘激素吸入疗法失败原因分析[J].四川医学, 2003, 24(2):2-4.
[4] 张旭中, 潘家华, 温晓红.卡介苗/纯蛋白衍生物对支气管哮喘患儿临床症状及肺功能的影响[J].实用儿科临床杂志, 2012, 27(4):248-250.
[5] 中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组, 中华儿科杂志编辑委员会.儿童支气管哮喘诊断与防治指南[J].中华儿科杂志, 2008, 46(10):745-753.
[6] 潘黎明.健康教育在儿童哮喘防治中的作用及其效果评价[D].吉林:吉林大学硕士学位论文, 2009.
[7] 杨娟, 尹力平, 徐丽.健康教育路径在住院哮喘患儿中的应用[J].护理实践与研究, 2013, 10(3):134-135.
[8] Nicola R, Ruth J.Developing novel evidence-based interventions to promote asthma action plan use:a cross-study synthesis of evidence from randomized controlled trials and qualitiative studies[J].Trials, 2012, 13:216-228.

基金

唐山市科技厅(121302069a)

PDF(412 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/