Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application value of three comprehensive methods in children's health care,and to understand the quality and development of children's health care work in 2014.Method TOPSIS method,RSR method and linear interpolation method were used for the comprehensive evaluation of child care work in 2014.Spearman correlation was conducted to analyze the consistence and difference of the ranked results among three kinds of comprehensive evaluation method by SPSS 17.0.Results There were differences among evaluation results of the three methods.In order to ensure the objectivity of the evaluation results,three methods were integrated and the results were displayed that the top three regions were Jiangsu,Shanghai and Shaanxi,and the sections listed the last three were Qinghai,Xinjiang and Tibet.Spearman correlation analysis,showed that the consistence between TOPSI method and linear interpolation method was the highest (r=0.969,P=0.000),followed by the correlation between TOPSIS method and RSR method (r=0.883,P=0.000),and the correlation between RSR method and linear interpolation method (r=0.795,P=0.000).Conclusions The ranked results by using TOPSIS method,RSR method,and linear interpolation method are highly correlated.The rank results will be more objectively,and will comprehensively reflect the situation of child health care in various provinces and cities by the conjunction of comprehensive evaluation with multiple methods.

Key words: TOPSIS method, RSR method, linear interpolation method, child health care

摘要： 目的 比较三种评价方法在儿童保健工作中的应用价值,了解2014年全国儿童保健工作质量与开展情况。方法 采用TOPSIS法、RSR法和线性插值法对全国各地区儿童保健工作进行综合评价,应用SPSS 17.0对排序结果进行Spearman相关性分析和差异性的秩和检验。结果 3种评价方法的评价结果各异,为保证结果的客观性,对3种方法综合排序,排序前三位的分别是江苏、上海和陕西,后三位的分别是青海、新疆和西藏。经Spearman相关分析,TOPSIS和线性插值法排序结果的一致性最好(r=0.969,P=0.000),其次是TOPSIS法和RSR法(r=0.883,P=0.000),RSR法和线性插值法(r=0.795,P=0.000)。结论 3种评价方法的排序结果具有较强的相关性,多种综合方法联合评价,其排序结果更能客观、准确、全面地反映全国各省市儿童保健情况。

关键词: TOPSIS法, RSR法, 线性插值法, 儿童保健