Objective To compare visiting rates and the scores of early development promotion at home in two different management models for premature infants of post-discharge,and to explore possible associated factors. Methods In four sample counties from Shaanxi and Guangxi provinces in China,416 preterm infants were visited regularly since post-discharge.Management Modle one in Guangxi,the preterm infants with high risk factors were visited by doctors at county level and the others by doctors at township level.Management Modle two in Shaanxi,all preterm infants were visited by doctors at county level.In the 4 counties,visiting intervals and contents were all unified. Results The visiting rates in Modle one was 86.3%,which was higher than that (57.0%) in Modle two (P<0.01);The scores of development promotion at home in Modle one were more than that in Modle two (P<0.01).Binary logistic and ordinal regression analysis showed that when parents as one of care givers (OR=99.491)or preterm infant having disease at birth(OR=1.853),the visiting rates were higher and when parents as one of care givers(P<0.01) or the less family's income(P<0.05),the scores of development promotion at home were more. Conclusions When preterm infants of post-discharge are classried and graded manageed by doctors at different levels,the visiting rates are higher and scores of early development promotion at home are more.The parents of preterm infants should be encouraged to raise their children by themselves.The health education should be improved for caregivers.
Key words
management models of preterm infants of post-discharge /
visiting rates /
scores of early development promotion at home
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Blencowe H,Cousens S,Oestergaard M,et al.National,regional and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries:a systematic analysis and implications[J].Lancet,2012,379(3):2162-2172.
[2] 鲍秀兰.重视高危儿的发育风险和早期科学干预对策[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(5):393-394.
[3] De Jong M,Verhoeven M,Lasham CA,et al.Behaviour and development in 24-month-old moderately preterm toddlers[J].Arch Dis Child,2015,100(6):548-553.
[4] Arpi E,Ferrari F.Preterm birth and behaviour problems in infants and preschool-age children:a review of the recent literature[J].Dev Med Child Neurol,2013,55(9):788-796.
[5] Miranda-Herrero MC,Pascual-Pascual SI,Barredo-Valderrama E,Visuospatial functions and prematurity[J].Rev Neurol,2014,59(9):411-418.
[6] 殷张华,钱继红,王蓓,等.晚期早产儿近期并发症及只能发育前瞻性研究[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2015,30(2):112-116.
[7] 郭淑娟,徐秀,夏经炜,等.早期干预对早产儿早期认知发展的影响研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(4):295-297.
[8] 袁欣,郝素媛,韩炳娟,等.早期早产儿和/或极低出生体重儿出院后随访及早期干预的临床研究[J].中华围产医学杂志,2015,18(4):296-299.
[9] Paolo T.Tne high-risk newborns[J].J Matem Fetal Neonatal Med,2012,25:6-7.
[10] 《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会儿童保健学组,中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组.早产、低出生体重儿出院后喂养建议[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(1):6-12.
[11] Wu YC,Leng CH,Hsieh WS,et al.A randomized controlled trial of clinic-based and home-based interventions in comparison with usual care for preterm infants:effects and mediators[J].Res Dev Disbil,2014,35(10):2384-2393.
[12] 程亚颖,冯琪,王颖,等.三级医院早产儿出院后随访现状及影响因素分析[J].中国新生儿科杂志,2015,30(6):401-407.
[13] Ballantyne M,Stevens B,Guttmann A,et al.Maternal and infant predictors of attendance at neonatal follow-up pregrammes[J].Child Care Health Dev,2014,40:250-258.
PDF(471 KB)
