Influence of different delivery status on school-age children&apos;s learning ability.

YAN Ju-hua; FENG Pei; NIU Xiao-hu; XU Tan

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-09-30

PDF(596 KB)

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (9) : 993-995. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-09-30

Influence of different delivery status on school-age children's learning ability.

YAN Ju-hua¹, FENG Pei¹, NIU Xiao-hu¹, XU Tan²

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective To analyse the influence of different delivery status on school-age children's learning ability. Methods A total of 4 983 children during 6~12 years old in Kunshan city were selected through cluster sampling Method.They and their teachers or parents were surveyed about learning ability and their delivery status.Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence of different delivery status on school-age children's learning ability. Results The average score of 4 983 children's learning ability was (4.26±50.52).The average score of the girls' learning ability (4.35±0.48) was higher than that of the boys' (4.18±0.53)(P<0.05).The average learning ability score of children in high grade (4.36±0.52) was higher than that of the children in middle (4.23±0.52) or low grade (4.18±0.49)(P<0.05).Multiple linear regressions found there was no statistical significance of the influence of cesarean and dystocia on the school-age children's learning ability after adjustment for gender and grade level.However,prematurity and postterm pregnancy could reduce the average score of children's learning ability after adjustment for gender and grade level,and the reduced score were 0.07 and 0.08,respectively. Conclusion Prematurity and postterm pregnancy could influence the school-age children's learning ability.

Key words

delivery way / delivery gestational age / learning ability

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

YAN Ju-hua, FENG Pei, NIU Xiao-hu, XU Tan. Influence of different delivery status on school-age children's learning ability.[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2016, 24(9): 993-995 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2016-24-09-30

References

[1] Muula AS.Ethical and practical consideration of women choosing cesarean section deliveries without "medical indication" in developing countries[J].Croatian Medical Journal,2007,48(1):94-102.
[2] Susan M.Caesarean section rate in England reaches 22%[J].BMJ,2002,324(7346):1118.
[3] 卢平,朱锐.不同分娩方式对12月龄儿童智力发育水平的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(6):657-659.
[4] 黄旭,王梦龙,静进,等.分娩方式对学龄前儿童气质、行为及智力影响的初步探讨[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2004,12(2):103-105.
[5] Jarjour IT.Neurodevelopmental outcome after extreme prematurity:a review of the literature[J].Pediatric Neurology,2015,52(2):143-152.
[6] 韩霞,冯佩,陈羿君,等.昆山市学龄期儿童学习困难影响因素研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2014,22(9):994-996.
[7] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013.
[8] 吴汉荣,余毅震,王礼桂,等.学习障碍儿童心理问题及心理辅导效果评价[J].中国学校卫生,2002,23(6):490-491.
[9] 罗定,周德群.小学、初中学生“阴盛阳弱”原因分析[J].中国德育,2001,5(1):62.
[10] 郭海英.小学低年级学生学习障碍成因分析及矫正对策研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2009.
[11] 张文坤,郝波,赵更力,等.不同分娩方式对婴儿心智发育的影响[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2008,16(2):141-143.
[12] Johnson S.Cognitive and behavioural outcomes following very preterm birth[J].Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine,2007,12(5):363-373.
[13] Louise M,Peacock JL,Calvert SA,et al.Factors affecting vocabulary acquisition at age 2 in children born between 23 and 28 weeks' gestation[J].Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology,2007,49(8):591-596.
[14] Catherine L,Haim B,Sullivan NR,et al.Positive screening for autism in expreterm infants:prevalence and risk factors[J].Pediatrics,2008,121(4):758-765.