2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-20

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (9): 931-930.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2017-25-09-20

2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较

陈小燕¹,吴婕翎¹,李明²,刘文博²,邹小兵³

1 广东省妇幼保健院,广东广州 511400;
2 中山大学-卡内基梅隆大学联合工程学院,广东广州 528300;
3 中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心,广东广州 510630

收稿日期:2017-02-10 发布日期:2017-09-10 出版日期:2017-09-10
通讯作者: 邹小兵,E-mail:zouxb@163.com
作者简介:陈小燕(1991-),女,福建人,住院医师,硕士学位,主要研究方向为儿童发育行为儿科学
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划 (973计划)项目 (2012CB517901)

Comparison of response to name between autism spectrum disorder children and healty children aged 2~3 years old

CHEN Xiao-yan¹,WU Jie-ling¹,LI Ming²,LIU Wen-bo²,ZOU Xiao-bing³

1 Guangdong Women and Children Hospital,Guangzhou,Guangdong 511400,China;
2 SYSU-CMU joint Institute of Engineering,Guangzhou,Guangdong 528300,China;
3 Children Development & Behavioral Center,the Third Affiliated Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510630,China

Received:2017-02-10 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10
Contact: ZOU Xiao-bing,E-mail:zouxb@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和正常儿童间叫名反应的客观量化的指标差异。方法纳入2016年5-8月在中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心确诊的2～3岁ASD儿童22名,正常儿童21名。在多模态实验室中进行标准流程叫名反应,通过评估师打分和计算机自动分析系统分析在正常情景反应下两组儿童的叫名反应的特征和差异。结果 1)ASD组与正常组儿童的叫名反应评分比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=15.764,P＜0.01)。2)对比计算机自动分析叫名反应的反应时间和持续时间,ASD和正常组在反应时间上的差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.593,P=0.113),ASD的持续时间短于正常组儿童,差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.4,P=0.001)。结论 2~3岁ASD儿童的叫名反应差于正常儿童,ASD儿童早期叫名反应的异常症状表现为目光对视更少和持续时间更短。

关键词: 叫名反应, 孤独症谱系障碍, 客观化

Abstract: Objective To explore the objectivity differences of responses to name between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and children with normal development.Method A total of 22 ASD children diagnosed in Children Development & Behavioral Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University from May to August in 2016 and 21 controls was enrolled in this study.In standard procedure testing the response to name.After that,two professional evaluators scored the response to name,and automatic system computational analyzed the time of response to name and duration to response.Result 1)There were no significant differences in scores of response to name between ASD children and normal children (Z=15.764,P＜0.01).2)The computational analysis showed that in response to name procedure,the response time showed no differences in ASD group and control group (Z=-1.593,P=0.113),But response duration was shorter in ASD group than that in control group(Z=-3.4,P=0.001).Conclusions Compared to normal children,2~3-year-old children with ASD have inferior behavior in response to name.The characteristics of abnormal response to name in ASD children include less eye contact and shorter response duration.

Key words: responses to name, autism spectrum disorder, objectivity

中图分类号:

R179

陈小燕,吴婕翎,李明,刘文博,邹小兵. 2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2017, 25(9): 931-930.

CHEN Xiao-yan,WU Jie-ling,LI Ming,LIU Wen-bo,ZOU Xiao-bing. Comparison of response to name between autism spectrum disorder children and healty children aged 2~3 years old[J]. journal1, 2017, 25(9): 931-930.

参考文献

[1] Wan MW,Green J,Elsabbagh M,et al.Quality of interaction between at risk infants and caregiver at 12-15 months is associated with 3-year autism outcome[J].Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2013,7:763-771.
[2] Dawson G,Toth K,Abbott R,et al.Early social attention impairments in autism:social orienting,joint attention,and attention to distress[J].Developmental Psychology,2004,40(2):271-283.
[3] Chawarska K,Macari S,Powell K,et al.Enhanced social attention in female infant siblings at risk for autism[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,2015,55(3):188-195.
[4] Abruzzo PM,Ghezzo A,Bolotta A,et al.Perspective biological markers for autism spectrum disorders:Advantages of the use of receiver operating characteristic curves in evaluating marker sensitivity and specificity[J].Disease Markers,2015,329607.doi:10.1155/2015/329607
[5] 王吉,梁亚勇,唐春,等.婴幼儿孤独症的早期预警信号[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2017,25(3):234-237.
[6] Bidwell J,Essa IA,Rozga A,et al.Measuring child visual attention using markerless head tracking from color and depth sensing cameras[M].//Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction-ICMI'14.New York,USA:ACM Press,2014:447-454.
[7] Lord C,Risi S,Lambrecht L,et al.The Autism Diagnostic Schedule - Generic:A standard measures of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism[J].Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,2000,30(3):205-223.
[8] Kondolot M,zmert EN,ztop DB,et al.The modified checklist for autism in Turkish toddlers:A different cultural adaptation sample[J].Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders,2016,21:121-127.
[9] De Giacomo A,Craig F,Cristella A,et al.Can PEP-3 provide a cognitive profile in children with ASD? A comparison between the developmental ages of PEP-3 and IQ of Leiter-R[J].Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,2016,29(6):566-573.
[10] Nadig AS,Ozonoff S,Young GS,et al.A prospective study of response to name in infants at risk for autism[J].Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine,2007,161(4):378-383.
[11] Ozonoff S,Iosif AM,Baguio F,et al.A prospective study of the emergence of early behavioral signs of autism[J].Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,2010,49(3):256-266.
[12] Gabrielsen TP,Farley M,Speer L,et al.Identifying autism in a brief observation[J].Pediatrics,2015,135(2):e330-e338.
[13] Zappella M,Einspieler C,Bartl-Pokorny KD,et al.What do home videos tell us about early motor and socio-communicative behaviours in children with autistic features during the second year of life-An exploratory study[J].Early Human Development,2015,91(10):569-575.
[14] Palomo R,Carmona MB,Ozonoff S.Autism and family home movies:A comprehensive review[J].Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics,2006,27(Suppl 2):59-68.
[15] Chawarska K,Macari S,Shic F.Decreased spontaneous attention to social scenes in[J].Biological Psychiatry,2013,74(3):195-203.
[16] Chawarska K,Ye S,Shic F,et al.Multilevel differences in spontaneous social attention in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder[J].Child Development,2016,87(2):543-557.
[17] Chita-Tegmark M.Social attention in ASD:A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies[J].Research in Developmental Disabilities,2015,48:79-93.
[18] Thorup E,Nystr m P,Gredeb ck G,et al.Altered gaze following during live interaction in infants at risk for autism:an eye tracking study[J].Molecular Autism,2016,7(1):12.
[19] Muskett T,Body R,Muskett TOM,et al.The case for multimodal analysis of atypical interaction:Questions,answers and gaze in play involving a child with autism[J].Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,2013,27(10-11):837.
[20] Fusaro VA,Daniels J,Duda M,et al.The potential of accelerating early detection of autism through content analysis of youtube videos[J].PLoS ONE,2014,9(4):1-6.

2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较

Comparison of response to name between autism spectrum disorder children and healty children aged 2~3 years old

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李廷玉, 韦秋宏, 李燕, 魏华, 代英, 陈立. 养育照护融合家庭干预模式用于孤独症谱系障碍的实践与展望[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 937-940.
[2]	静进. 孤独症谱系障碍“神经多样性”的观点及其评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 709-712.
[3]	丛妍, 王浩, 王栋, 俞露婷, 朱晓春. 婴儿期运动发育指标在孤独症谱系障碍儿童筛查中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 752-756.
[4]	张蓓, 王敏囡, 尼罗帕, 古丽加娜提·阿布拉克木, 克日曼·帕尔哈提, 何艳红, 阿曼古丽·卡德尔, 热娜·买买提. 产后早期免疫激活对小鼠孤独症样行为和胶质细胞的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(4): 405-411.
[5]	杨峰. 从言语病理学角度看孤独症谱系障碍儿童的沟通障碍[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 233-236.
[6]	王峰, 刘泽慧, 张艺霖, 田文茹, 杨凌渊, 邹明扬, 孙彩虹. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童外周血CNR1基因甲基化修饰水平的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 237-241.
[7]	侯耀奇, 宋湘勤. 运动干预改善孤独症谱系障碍儿童社会功能的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 291-295.
[8]	邹红, 朱健芳, 罗佳怡, 李丹丹, 吴迪. 孤独症谱系障碍的干预方法及发展趋势[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 317-321.
[9]	蔚然, 孔锐, 关陆阳, 王永露, 叶侃. 益生菌对孤独谱系障碍患者核心症状干预效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 322-328.
[10]	胥柯, 周勤, 吴明磊, 宋丽, 柯晓燕. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童的饮食睡眠问题及相关因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 329-333.
[11]	干凯滟, 黄安琪, 张子一, 关陆阳, 王菲, 柯晓燕. M-CHAT筛查阳性对孤独症谱系障碍早期诊断稳定性的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(10): 1076-1079.
[12]	杨帆, 李庆红, 李翌鸣, 杨顺波, 李威, 吕智海. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童屏幕使用现状及其与核心症状的相关性[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(10): 1080-1084.
[13]	静进. 孤独症谱系障碍的治疗干预现状与建议[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 939-944.
[14]	李亦诚, 张媛媛, 霍言言, 吴丹, 马玲, 仇晓艳, 马晨欢, 王健, 罗洁鸣, 李天舒, 徐敬, 周洁, 孙婷婷, 沈红英, 徐蕾, 王瑜, 陈津津. 应用移动端开展孤独症谱系障碍居家早期筛查的初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 963-968.
[15]	张婷, 邵智, 阳光, 陶洪梅, 彭帅, 张雅如, 王艺, 彭元琴. 综合性干预对孤独症谱系障碍儿童影响的追踪研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 969-974.