热性惊厥对儿童持续性注意力影响的研究

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 460-462.

热性惊厥对儿童持续性注意力影响的研究

石冰心,赵亚茹,姜淑萍

中国医科大学附属盛京医院发育儿科,辽宁沈阳 110004

收稿日期:2011-02-16 发布日期:2011-05-06 出版日期:2011-05-06
通讯作者: 赵亚茹,E-mail:zhaoyaru@163.com
作者简介:石冰心(1976-),女,辽宁人,主治医师,在读硕士研究生,主要研究方向为儿童心理,现工作单位辽宁辽阳辽化总医院儿科

Study on sustained attention in children with a history of febrile seizures

SHI Bing-xin, ZHAO Ya-ru, JIANG Shu-ping

Department of Developmental Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110004, China

Received:2011-02-16 Online:2011-05-06 Published:2011-05-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探讨热性惊厥(febrile seizures, FS)对儿童注意力的影响。【方法】对30例有单纯型热性惊厥(simple febrile seizures, SFS)史、30例有复杂型热性惊厥(complex febrile seizures, CFS)史和30例无热性惊厥史的儿童采用视听整合持续操作测试(integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test, IVA-CPT)进行对比分析。【结果】 CFS组综合注意商数为83.000±23.199、视觉注意力商数为83.167±23.878、视觉一致性商数为92.250±16.103、视觉警醒商数为79.000±27.330、听觉警醒商数为77.167±29.652和视觉集中商数为95.417±10.975,而正常对照组的上述结果分别为98.947±14.905, 99.632±14.359, 105.605±12.684, 96.895±16.097, 95.632±19.462,和104.947±10.449,两组结果比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均< 0.05) 。SFS组与正常对照组之间各注意力商数差异无统计学意义。CFS组与SFS组仅听觉警醒商数一项差异有统计学意义,余各项商数差异均无统计学意义。【结论】复杂型热性惊厥儿童存在反应控制力和持续性注意力的损害,单纯型热性惊厥儿童不存在反应控制力和持续性注意力的损害。

关键词: 热性惊厥, 视听整合持续操作测试, 儿童

Abstract: 【Objective】 To explore the characteristics of sustained attention in children with a history of febrile seizures (FS). 【Methods】 Thirsty children with a history of simple febrile seizures (SFS), 30 children with a history of complex febrile seizures (CFS) and 30 children without a history of FS were assessed using the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-CPT). The quotients among groups were compared. 【Results】 In the CFS group, the combination attention quotient was 83.000±23.199, the visual attention quotient was 83.167±23.878, the visual concordance quotient was 92.250±16.103, the visual vigilance quotient was 79.000±27.330, the auditory vigilance quotient was77.167±29.652, and the visual focus quotient was 95.417±10.975. The quotients in the normal control group were 98.947±14.905, 99.632±14.359, 105.605±12.684, 96.895±16.097, 95.632±19.462, and 104.947±10.449, respectively. The results of the two groups were significantly different (P<0.05). No significant differences were found between the SFS group and normal group in any of the quotients. A significant difference between the CFS group and SFS group was only found in the auditory vigilance quotient: the other quotients were not significantly different. 【Conclusion】 The ability of response control and sustained attention is impaired in children with CFS and not impaired in children with SFS.

Key words: febrile seizures, IVA-CPT, children

中图分类号:

R749.94

石冰心,赵亚茹,姜淑萍. 热性惊厥对儿童持续性注意力影响的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2011, 19(5): 460-462.

SHI Bing-xin, ZHAO Ya-ru, JIANG Shu-ping. Study on sustained attention in children with a history of febrile seizures[J]. journal1, 2011, 19(5): 460-462.

参考文献

[1] Piperidou HN, Heliopoulos IN, Maltezos ES, et al. Retrospective study of febrile seizures: subsequent electroencephalogram findings, unprovoked seizures and epilepsy in adolescents[J]. J Int Med Res,2002,30(6):560-565.
[2] Lynch M, Sayin U, Bownds J, et al. Long-term consequences of early postnatal seizures on hippocampal learning and plasticity[J]. Eur J Neurosci, 2002,12(7):2252-2264.
[3] 吴小慧,麦坚凝,杨思渊.热性惊厥影响患儿行为的研究[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2009,24(7):548-551.
[4] 吴启华.小儿神经系统疾病[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:424-434.
[5] 潘学霞,麻宏伟.持续性操作测验在儿童注意缺陷多动障碍诊断及治疗中的应用[J].国际儿科学杂志,2008,36(1):100-102.
[6] 及春兰,马扬,张锋,等.313例ADHD儿童注意力测评结果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(27):3834-3836.
[7] 鲍灵芝,余新艳,王霞.高热惊厥复发危险因素与预后分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,2010,32 (7):633-634.
[8] 吴鸣,陆巧英,陈炳才,等.单纯型热性惊厥患儿脑脊液β2微球蛋白与脑损伤的研究[J].实用中西医结合临床,2006,6(6):32-33.
[9] 杨志仙,秦炯,周国平,等.发育期大鼠高热惊厥脑损伤模型的建立[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2002,34(3):225-228.
[10] Conners CK, Epstein JN, Angold A, et al. Differential measures of ‘sustained attention’ in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity or tic disorders : relations to monoamine metabolism[J]. Psychiatry Res, 2000,93(2):165-178.
[11] Pessoa L, Ungerleider LG. Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli[J]. Prog Brain Res,2004,144:171-182.
[12] 曹庆隽,王华.儿童热性惊厥发作后急性期海马体积改变的临床研究[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2010,12,(4):259-261.
[13] Natsume J,Bernasconi N,Miyauchi M,et al. Hippocampal volumes and diffusion-weighted image findings in children with prolonged febrile seizures[J]. Acta Neurol Scand,2007,115(4):25-28.
[14] Riccio CA,Reynolds CR,Lowe P, et al. The continuous performance test: a window on the neural substrates for attention?[J]. Arch Clin Neuropsychol,2002,17(3):235-272.

[1]	梁雁, 罗小平. 遗传代谢病的治疗进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 929-933.
[2]	王雯雷, 张俊, 厚磊, 张荣, 夏木斯叶·木依都力, 董言, 者炜, 沙吾拉西·热加甫, 方萍, 阿迪拉·苏力旦. 新疆7～17岁儿童青少年超重肥胖和血压关系的关联研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 953-957.
[3]	林崟, 刘军霞, 张林, 颜崇淮. 上海市0~6岁儿童血砷水平与体格生长的关系[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 969-973.
[4]	王爱, 周冰倩, 于健, 曹虹. 儿童青少年骨健康的评估及其影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 980-983.
[5]	夏嘉苓, 官计, 方悦, 黄迎春, 刘颖, 李凡, 吉木尔呷木. 儿童家庭饮食环境的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 984-988.
[6]	孙艳会, 李杨方. 儿童语言发育迟缓临床特征及诊治研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 999-1003.
[7]	谢婷婷, 裴梓贻, 张悦. 音乐疗法在儿童康复中的应用研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 1004-1007.
[8]	陈秀锦, 蒋晓兰, 陈红夷, 王琪, 陈俊霖. 0～6岁儿童维生素D水平的影响因素及其与维生素K1和K2的相关性分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 1014-1018.
[9]	张霆. 儿童早期发育的表观遗传运动调控机制的认识进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 821-825.
[10]	鹿文英, 柏品清, 徐划萍, 任亚萍, 胡卉, 解辉. 运动及行为干预改善儿童超重和肥胖效果评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 832-837.
[11]	苏比努尔·沙依提, 高雯颖, 郭心宇, 任姿锦, 李蕴伶, 张莹. 喀什地区维吾尔族学龄期哮喘儿童的运动状况及影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 838-843.
[12]	程轲, 王宝西, 王春晖, 宋丽佳, 习颖, 郭薇, 杨茜, 兰莉. 5~14岁儿童青少年体成分与骨密度的关联[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 844-849.
[13]	张旭彤, 李娜, 吴娟娟, 陈欣月, 赵南洋, 陈黎明, 戴泰鸣. 贵州省12岁儿童口腔健康相关生活质量及影响因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 862-867.
[14]	陈瑜洁, 李晓南. 行为干预在儿童肥胖管理中的应用进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 875-880.
[15]	刘璐洁, 徐东, 尹春燕, 肖延风. 儿童肥胖代谢组学的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(8): 881-885.