不同叫名者对孤独症谱系障碍幼儿叫名反应的影响研究

doi:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-07-04

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 709-711.DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-07-04

不同叫名者对孤独症谱系障碍幼儿叫名反应的影响研究

朱风雷, 陈凯云, 汪芳, 成三梅, 邹小兵

中山大学附属第三医院儿童发育行为中心,广东广州 510630;

收稿日期:2018-01-23 发布日期:2018-07-10 出版日期:2018-07-10
通讯作者: 邹小兵,E-mail:zouxb@vip.tom.com
作者简介:朱风雷(1988-),男,河南人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事儿童发育行为相关疾病研究。
基金资助:
公益性行业科研专项项目(201302002);广东省天河区科技计划项目(2013KW037)

Impact of different callers on response to name in autism spectrum disorders infants

ZHU Feng-lei, CHEN Kai-yun, WANG Fang, CHENG San-mei, ZOU Xiao-bing

Child Developmental and Behavioral Center,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510630,China;

Received:2018-01-23 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-07-10
Contact: ZOU Xiao-bing,E-mail:zouxb@vip.tom.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)幼儿在不同叫名者叫名时的反应特征进行分析,以探究叫名者熟悉程度对幼儿叫名反应的影响。方法 2017年4月-2018年2月采用视频分析的方式,对72例ASD幼儿的行为反应进行评分,并与同年龄36例正常儿童(NT)及36例发育迟缓儿童(DD)进行对比。结果除DD组幼儿在反应率方面由不同叫名者叫名时的反应差异有统计学意义外(Z=-5.01,P<0.01),三组幼儿在叫名反应得分、反应时间、反应持续时间及反应率各指标方面由不同叫名者叫名时的反应差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。ASD组及非ASD组幼儿由单一叫名者叫名时有反应者所占比例均低于测试者与照顾者分别叫名整体有反应者的比例,差异均有统计学意义(χ²=11.15、9.06、11.39、10.23,P均<0.01)。结论虽然各组幼儿在照顾者叫名时并无明显反应偏好,但通过测试者与照顾者分别叫名,能够有效降低幼儿在叫名反应测试中的无反应性偏倚。

关键词: 孤独症谱系障碍, 叫名反应, 视频分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the influence of different callers on response to name among infants with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Methods Totally 72 ASD,36 developmental delays (DD) and 36 neuro-typical (NT) infants aged 16 to 30 months,were recruited from Child Developmental and Behavioral Center and near communities from April 2017 to February 2018.Response to name contained two main procedures: the tester procedure and the caregiver procedure.Behavioral data were collected by cameras,coded by two professional staffs,and compared among three groups. Results The difference of response rate between the tester procedure and the caregiver procedure in DD group was significant (Z=-5.01,P<0.01); While the differences on response rate in ASD and NT group,the differences on response score,response time,and response duration time among three groups were not significant(P＞0.05).Moreover,there were significant differences on the proportion of responsive infants in both ASD and non-ASD group between single caller procedure and the total procedures (χ²=11.15,9.06,11.39,10.23,all P<0.01). Conclusion Although there was no significant response preference for caregivers among all group infants,subjects' name called by testers and caregivers respectively could effectively reduce the response bias in response to name procedures.

Key words: autism spectrum disorders, response to name, video analysis

中图分类号:

R179

朱风雷, 陈凯云, 汪芳, 成三梅, 邹小兵. 不同叫名者对孤独症谱系障碍幼儿叫名反应的影响研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2018, 26(7): 709-711.

ZHU Feng-lei, CHEN Kai-yun, WANG Fang, CHENG San-mei, ZOU Xiao-bing. Impact of different callers on response to name in autism spectrum disorders infants[J]. journal1, 2018, 26(7): 709-711.

参考文献

[1] Barnett R.Autism[J].Lancet,2016,387(10033):2082.
[2] Christensen DL,Baio J,Van Naarden Braun K,et al.Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network,11 sites,united states,2012[J].MMWR Surveill Summ,2016,65(3):1-23.
[3] 石慧峰,张敬旭,张嵘,等.中国0~6岁儿童孤独症谱系障碍患病率的meta分析[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2017,49(5):798-806.
[4] Miller M,Iosif AM,Hill M,et al.Response to name in infants developing autism spectrum disorder: a prospective study[J].J Pediatr,2017,183:141-146.
[5] 徐云,杨健.自闭症早期发现研究进展[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(6):1023-1027.
[6] Osterling J,Dawson G.Early recognition of children with autism: a study of first birthday home videotapes[J].J Autism Dev Disord,1994,24(3):247-257.
[7] Imafuku M,Hakuno Y,Uchida-Ota M,et al.“Mom called me!” Behavioral and prefrontal responses of infants to self-names spoken by their mothers[J].Neuroimage,2014,103: 476-484.
[8] Grzadzinski R,Huerta M,Lord C.DSM-5 and autism spectrum disorders (ASDs):an opportunity for identifying ASD subtypes[J].Mol Autism,2013,4(1):12.
[9] Lord C,Risi S,Lambrecht L,et al.The autism diagnostic observation schedule—generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism[J].J Autism Dev Disord,2000,30(3):205-223.
[10] Nadig AS,Ozonoff S,Young GS,et al.A prospective study of response to name in infants at risk for autism[J].Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med,2007,161(4):378-383.
[11] Soskey LN,Allen PD,Bennetto L.Auditory spatial attention to speech and complex non-speech sounds in children with autism spectrum disorder[J].Autism Res,2017,10(8):1405-1416.
[12] Jaworski JL,Eigsti IM.Low-level visual attention and its relation to joint attention in autism spectrum disorder[J].Child Neuropsychol,2017,23(3):316-331.
[13] Jones EJ,Venema K,Earl R,et al.Reduced engagement with social stimuli in 6-month-old infants with later autism spectrum disorder: a longitudinal prospective study of infants at high familial risk[J].J Neurodev Disord,2016,8:7.
[14] 陈小燕,吴婕翎,李明,等.2～3岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童与正常儿童叫名反应的比较[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2017,25(9):931-934.
[15] Gabrielsen TP,Farley M,Speer L,et al.Identifying autism in a brief observation[J].Pediatrics,2015,135(2):e330-e338.
[16] Tamura K,Mizuba T,Iramina K.Hearing subject's own name induces the late positive component of event-related potential and beta power suppression[J].Brain Res,2016,1635:130-142.
[17] Wang F,Di H,Hu X,et al.Cerebral response to subject's own name showed high prognostic value in traumatic vegetative state[J].BMC Med,2015,13:83.
[18] Tateuchi T,Itoh K,Nakada T.Further characterization of "subject's own name (SON) negativity," an ERP component reflecting early preattentive detection of SON[J].BMC Res Notes,2015,8:195.
[19] Eggebrecht AT,Elison JT,Feczko E,et al.Joint Attention and Brain Functional Connectivity in Infants and Toddlers[J].Cereb Cortex,2017,27(3):1709-1720.
[20] Xu M,Hoshino E,Yatabe K,et al.Prefrontal function engaging in external-focused attention in 5- to 6-month-old infants: a suggestion for default mode network[J].Front Hum Neurosci,2016,10:676.

不同叫名者对孤独症谱系障碍幼儿叫名反应的影响研究

Impact of different callers on response to name in autism spectrum disorders infants

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李廷玉, 韦秋宏, 李燕, 魏华, 代英, 陈立. 养育照护融合家庭干预模式用于孤独症谱系障碍的实践与展望[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(9): 937-940.
[2]	静进. 孤独症谱系障碍“神经多样性”的观点及其评价[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 709-712.
[3]	丛妍, 王浩, 王栋, 俞露婷, 朱晓春. 婴儿期运动发育指标在孤独症谱系障碍儿童筛查中的应用[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(7): 752-756.
[4]	张蓓, 王敏囡, 尼罗帕, 古丽加娜提·阿布拉克木, 克日曼·帕尔哈提, 何艳红, 阿曼古丽·卡德尔, 热娜·买买提. 产后早期免疫激活对小鼠孤独症样行为和胶质细胞的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(4): 405-411.
[5]	杨峰. 从言语病理学角度看孤独症谱系障碍儿童的沟通障碍[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 233-236.
[6]	王峰, 刘泽慧, 张艺霖, 田文茹, 杨凌渊, 邹明扬, 孙彩虹. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童外周血CNR1基因甲基化修饰水平的研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 237-241.
[7]	侯耀奇, 宋湘勤. 运动干预改善孤独症谱系障碍儿童社会功能的研究进展[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 291-295.
[8]	邹红, 朱健芳, 罗佳怡, 李丹丹, 吴迪. 孤独症谱系障碍的干预方法及发展趋势[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 317-321.
[9]	蔚然, 孔锐, 关陆阳, 王永露, 叶侃. 益生菌对孤独谱系障碍患者核心症状干预效果的荟萃分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 322-328.
[10]	胥柯, 周勤, 吴明磊, 宋丽, 柯晓燕. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童的饮食睡眠问题及相关因素[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(3): 329-333.
[11]	干凯滟, 黄安琪, 张子一, 关陆阳, 王菲, 柯晓燕. M-CHAT筛查阳性对孤独症谱系障碍早期诊断稳定性的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(10): 1076-1079.
[12]	杨帆, 李庆红, 李翌鸣, 杨顺波, 李威, 吕智海. 孤独症谱系障碍儿童屏幕使用现状及其与核心症状的相关性[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2024, 32(10): 1080-1084.
[13]	静进. 孤独症谱系障碍的治疗干预现状与建议[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 939-944.
[14]	李亦诚, 张媛媛, 霍言言, 吴丹, 马玲, 仇晓艳, 马晨欢, 王健, 罗洁鸣, 李天舒, 徐敬, 周洁, 孙婷婷, 沈红英, 徐蕾, 王瑜, 陈津津. 应用移动端开展孤独症谱系障碍居家早期筛查的初步研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 963-968.
[15]	张婷, 邵智, 阳光, 陶洪梅, 彭帅, 张雅如, 王艺, 彭元琴. 综合性干预对孤独症谱系障碍儿童影响的追踪研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志, 2023, 31(9): 969-974.