Abstract: Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Swanson,Nolan,and Pelham,version Ⅳ scale(SNAP-Ⅳ)-parent form for preschooler in China. Method Parents of kindergarten students(4 y 0 m~5 y 11 m,n=81)and parents of non-reference clinical patients with ADHD(4 y 0 m~5 y 11 m,n=200) completed the SNAP-Ⅳ,75 of which completed Conners,265 of which completed Child Bahabior Checklist (CBCL) 32 of them completed SNAP-Ⅳ retest after 2 weeks. Results Retest reliability was 0.68~0.84 and Cronbach α coefficient was 0.84~0.93.Subscales of SNAP-Ⅳ were moderately correlated (r=0.38~0.79,P<0.001)with subscales of Conners and CBCL.Lisrel Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three factors model of SNAP-Ⅳ was reasonable.Compared with the normal control group,the ADHD group got higher scores in all aspects,which had significant statistically differences (t=-4.22~-9.67,P<0.001). Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of SNAP-Ⅳ-parent form are satisfactory among preschooler in China.

Key words: Swanson Nolan and Pelham-Ⅳ, preschooler, reliability, validity

摘要： 目的 评价中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表-父母版在学龄前儿童中的适用性。方法 选择门诊诊断为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童200名以及附近幼儿园的81名正常儿童为研究对象,年龄范围4岁～5岁11个月。请其家长填写SNAP-Ⅳ父母版后,问卷进行内部一致性和验证性因素分析,其中75名家长填写Conners问卷,265名家长填写CBCL量表以检查效标效度。32名家长间隔2周之后再次填写SNAP-Ⅳ以检查重测信度。结果 SNAP-Ⅳ重测信度为0.68~0.84(P<0.001),内部一致性系数为0.84~0.93;SNAP-Ⅳ与Conners问卷及CBCL量表因子相关系数为r=0.38~0.79(P<0.01);验证性因素分析显示,SNAP-Ⅳ 3因子模型结构拟合良好;实证效度在SNAP-Ⅳ各因子评分上,ADHD组显著高于年龄、性别相匹配的正常组(t=-4.22~-9.67,P<0.001)。结论 中文版SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表父母版在学前儿童中具有良好的信度和效度,适用于我国文化背景。

关键词: SNAP-Ⅳ评定量表, 学龄前儿童, 信度, 效度