Objective To investigate the graphic naming development ability of children aged 3 to 6 years in Shanghai,so as to know about the general rules of graphic naming ability. Methods According to the principle of stratified cluster sampling,781 children aged 3~6 years in Shanghai were tested with the graphic naming test module of Dr.Brain-1 in March 2018.And the difference among children in different age and gender groups was compared using multivariate analysis of variance. Results 1) There was very significant difference on the scores of flat graphics and three-dimensional graphics in children at different age groups (P<0.01),but the difference was not significant between boys and girls (P>0.05),and there was no interaction effect between age and gender (P>0.05).2) Children scored higher in naming flat graphics than three-dimensional graphics.3) In terms of naming order of flat graphics,children first learned round,five-pointed star and heart shape,and finally learned parallelogram and regular hexagon.4) In terms of naming order of three-dimensional graphics,children first learned spheres,cubes and cuboids,and finally learned cylinders and cones. Conclusion There is a difference on the development of the graphic naming ability of children aged 3 to 6 years between children at different age stage groups,and there is a specific acquisition order,which can provide reference for normal children′s graphic learning and early screening and intervention of children with graphic cognitive impairment,thereby promoting the comprehensive and balanced development of children′s cognitive abilities.
Key words
children aged 3 to 6 years /
graphic naming ability /
early intervention
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 金星明.促进发育行为儿科学与儿童保健学的和谐发展[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2011,19(1):5-6.
[2] 常宏.3~6岁儿童平面几何图形组合能力的发展研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2009.
[3] 邹雨晨,李燕芳,丁颖.早期高级认知发展与前额叶功能发育的fNIRS研究[J].心理发展与教育,2015,31(6):761-768.
[4] 蒋新液,马玉杰,陈雅芬,等.480名正常婴幼儿认知发育影响因素调查[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2013,21(12):1321-1323.
[5] 程大志,陈倩.基于脑科学的儿童神经认知发育障碍评估与干预[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2017,32(4):275-279.
[6] 白银婷,杜晓新,卢红云.特殊儿童早期认知能力干预方法[J].社会福利,2011,8(9):44-45.
[7] 焦丽珍,江丽君.空间学习:三维世界的“潜行者”[J].开放教育研究,2011,17(3):34-41.
[8] 张华,庞丽娟,陶沙,等.儿童早期数学认知能力的结构及其特点[J].心理学报,2003,36(6):810-817.
[9] Roberts JE,Bell MA.Sex differences on a mental rotation task: variations in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students[J].Dev Neuropsychol,2000,17(2):199-223.
[10] 王艳云.不同干预方式对幼儿数学玩具操作的影响—以多边形分数板玩具为例[J].学前教育研究,2009,23(5):12-22.
[11] 章依文,金星明,沈晓明,等.2~3岁儿童语言发育迟缓筛查标准的建立[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2003,11(5):308-310.
[12] 臧勇,钱珏,王合香,等.图形从平面空间到三维空间的创意探索—基于图形创意课程的教学实践[J].装饰,2014,27(3):82-83.
[13] 张青宇,解雅春,区嘉欣,等.江苏省1~6岁儿童名词发展的特征研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(4):370-373.
[14] 王明英.大连市3~6岁幼儿几何形体认知发展特点研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2014.
[15] 陈玮.3~6岁幼儿图形认知发展特点及促进研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2017.