Study on the false memory in different age stages and different language types

YUE Lei, SUN Yan-chao, JIA Li-ping

Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10) : 1126-1129.

PDF(570 KB)
PDF(570 KB)
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10) : 1126-1129. DOI: 10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-10-22

Study on the false memory in different age stages and different language types

  • YUE Lei1, SUN Yan-chao2, JIA Li-ping2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of the language types and age on students′ false memory,in order to provide empirical evidence for further clarifying the mechanism and influencing factors of false memory . Method A total of 60 students from university,high school and junior school in Weifang were selected as subjects in April 2015.False memory test was conducted with DRM paradigm using Chinese and English words as the experimental material.Variance analysis was used get statistical results. Results 1)The correct recognition rate and the false recognition rate of critical lure were higher than those of irrelevant items(P<0.01);2) The correct recognition rate of college students was significantly higher than that of high school students and junior school students(P<0.05);There was no significant effect of learning on the correct recognition rate in different language types(P>0.05);3)The recognition rate of the critical lure of low age students was significantly lower than that of high age students(P<0.05);The false recognition rate of key bait in Chinese learning program was significantly higher than that in English learning program(P<0.05). Conclusions With the growth of age,the correct recognition rate of learning program is gradually improving,and different language and age have significant effect on false memory.

Key words

false memory / age stage / language types / DRM paradigm

Cite this article

Download Citations
YUE Lei, SUN Yan-chao, JIA Li-ping. Study on the false memory in different age stages and different language types[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2018, 26(10): 1126-1129 https://doi.org/10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-26-10-22

References

[1] Jacoby LL,Rhodes MG.False remembering in the aged[J].Curr Dir Psychol Sci,2006,15(2):49-53.
[2] Carneiro P,Garcia-Marques L,Fernandez A,et al.Both associative activation and thematic extraction count,but thematic false memories are more easily rejected[J].Memory,2014,22(8):1024-1040.
[3] 江荣焕,李晓东.错误记忆的发展性逆转:为什么越长大越易“错”?[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(8):1371-1379.
[4] 黄一帆,王大华,肖红蕊,等.DRM范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制[J].心理发展与教育,2014,30(1):24-30.
[5] 毛伟宾,杨志良,王林松,等.非熟练中—英双语者跨语言的错误记忆通道效应[J].心理学报,2008,40(3):274-282.
[6] Kawasaki-Miyaji Y,Inoue T,Yama H.Cross-linguistic false recognition:How do Janpanese-dominant bilinguals process two languages:Japanese and English?[J].Psychologia,2003,46(4):255-267.
[7] 郝兴昌.DRM范式下的儿童错误记忆研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2013.
[8] Stadler MA,Rd RH,Mcdermott KB.Norms for word lists that create false memories[J].Mem Cognit,1999,27(3):494-500.
[9] 刘泽文,郭谦,葛列众.两种视觉特征提示对儿童错误记忆发展的影响[J].心理学报,2010,42(3):406-414.
[10] Brainerd CJ,Wright R,Reyna VF,et al.Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection[J].J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn,2001,27(2):307-327.
[11] Brainerd CJ,Reyna VF.Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development[J].Dev Rev,2004,24(4):396-439.
[12] Arndt J,Beato MS.The role of language proficiency in producing false memories[J].J Mem Lang,2017,95:146-158.
PDF(570 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/