混龄教育和同龄教育幼儿分享行为的对比研究

牛玉柏,李占星,胡瑛

中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1) : 27-29.

PDF(474 KB)
PDF(474 KB)
中国儿童保健杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1) : 27-29.
科研论著

混龄教育和同龄教育幼儿分享行为的对比研究

  • 牛玉柏1,李占星1,胡瑛2
作者信息 +

Comparison study on sharing behavior of children coming from two different education models

  • NIU Yu-bai1,LI Zhan-xing1,HU Ying2.
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 比较混龄教育模式和同龄教育模式对幼儿分享行为的影响,为广泛开展混龄编班的教育模式提供依据。方法 设置糖果、玩具、经验三种不同的分享物,区分两组不同的分享对象-低龄幼儿和同龄幼儿,对来自不同教育模式的 60名中班和大班幼儿进行考察。 结果 幼儿的分享行为不存在显著的性别效应,但是对不同分享物的分享行为差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。混龄教育幼儿对不同分享物的分享行为成绩从高到低依次为经验分享、玩具分享、糖果分享;同龄教育幼儿对不同分享物的分享行为成绩从高到低依次为经验分享、糖果分享、玩具分享。混龄教育的幼儿比同龄教育的幼儿更倾向于与低龄幼儿分享,这一效应在玩具分享中差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 混龄教育可显著促进儿童与低龄对象的分享行为。

Abstract

Objective To compare the sharing behavior of children coming from two different education models,and provide some evidence for the prevalence of mixed-age education. Methods The study used the sweets,the toy car and the learning experience as three different things to be shared,and discriminated two different sharing objects-the younger children and the same-age children,with the subjects being sixty preschoolers coming from two different education models. Results There was no significant gender effect,but the effect of different sharing things was absolutely obvious(P<0.05).The mixed-age education children were more likely to share learning experience than toy car and sweets,while the same-age education children demonstrated a similar trend.Besides,the mixed-age education children were more willing to share with their younger partners,this effect was significant in the condition when they shared toy car(P<0.05). Conclusion Mixed-aged education could accelerate children's sharing behavior with their younger partners.

关键词

混龄教育 / 同龄教育 / 分享物 / 分享对象 / 分享行为

Key words

mixed-age education / same-age education / things to be shared / sharing objects / sharing behavior

引用本文

导出引用
牛玉柏,李占星,胡瑛. 混龄教育和同龄教育幼儿分享行为的对比研究[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志. 2013, 21(1): 27-29
NIU Yu-bai,LI Zhan-xing,HU Ying.. Comparison study on sharing behavior of children coming from two different education models[J]. Chinese Journal of Child Health Care. 2013, 21(1): 27-29
中图分类号: R749.94   

参考文献

[1] 王海梅,陈会昌,谷传华.关于儿童分享的研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(1):52-58.
[2] Berndt TJ.Effects of friendship on prosocial intentions and behavior[J].Child Development,1981,52:636-643.
[3] 许政援,吴念阳.3~6 岁幼儿亲社会行为一致性的研究[J].心理科学,1992,5(1):51-53.
[4] 李幼穗,赵莹.4~6 岁儿童分享行为的特点及培养策略[J].学前教育研究,2008,2(1):39-41.
[5] Staub E,Sherk L.Need for approval,children's sharing behaviors and reciprocity in sharing[J].Child Development,1970,41:243-252.
[6] Fishbein HD,Kaminsiki NK.Children 's reciprocal altruism in a competitive game[J].British Journal of Developmental Psychology,1985,3:393-398.
[7] 寇彧,赵章留.小学 4~6 年级儿童对同伴亲社会行为动机的评价[J].心理学探新,2004,2(1):48-52.
[8] 玛丽娅-蒙台梭利.吸收性心智[M].北京儿童之家教育研究中心.兰州:兰州大学出版社,2002:314.
[9] 张玉萍,苏彦捷.混龄编班对四岁儿童心理理论发展的影响[J].心理科学,2007,30(6):1397-1401.
[10] 丁芳,郭勇.幼儿心理理论、移情和亲社会行为的关系[J].心理科学,2010,33(3):660-662.
[11] Paal T,Bereczkei T.Adult theory of mind,cooperation,machiavellianism:The effect of mindreading on social relations[J].Personality and Individual Differences,2007,43(3):541-551.

基金

浙江省教育科学规划课题(SCG249)

PDF(474 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/