目的 评价学校预防性侵犯教育对初一年级学生知识和技能的影响，为在初中生中开展预防性侵犯教育和研究提供科学依据。方法 采用方便取样。选取北京市3所学校初一年级学生作为研究对象。将学生以班级为单位分为教育组和对照组。由学校教师使用统一编写的教案，在学校对学生开展预防性侵犯教育。分别于教育前、教育后1周和教育后4个月对学生进行问卷调查，比较两组学生预防性侵犯知识和技能的差异。结果 有关预防性侵犯知识和技能，教育前，教育组与对照组学生得分（知识 2.17 vs 2.21;技能 1.97 vs 1.97）比较差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；教育后1周和教育后4个月，教育组学生知识和技能得分均明显高于对照组学生得分（教育后1周，知识：3.20 vs 2.35,技能：2.72 vs 2.09；教育后4个月，知识：3.00 vs 2.58，技能：2.58 vs 2.20），差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。结论 学校预防性侵犯教育，可有效地帮助初一年级学生学习预防性侵犯知识和技能。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the impact of school-based child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention education on grade 7 students' knowledge and skills,and provide basic information for CSA prevention education in middle school. Methods Convenient sample was used in this study.Students of grade 7 in this study were from 3 schools in Beijing,China.The students were divided into education group and control group by class randomly.The CSA prevention education was conducted by school teachers using the unified curriculum.Pre-test,post-test and follow-up test were completed by the students to evaluate the impact of school CSA prevention education on the students' knowledge and skills. Results About CSA prevention knowledge and skills,before education there was no significant difference between the scores of students in the education group and control group (knowledge 2.17 vs 2.21;skills 1.97 vs 1.97).One week and 4 months after education,the scores of knowledge and skills of students in the education group were significantly higher than the scores of students in the control group (post-test,knowledge:3.20 vs 2.35,skills:2.72 vs 2.09; follow-up test,knowledge:3.00 vs 2.58,skills:2.58 vs 2.20),the differences were significant statistically (P all<0.01). Conclusion School CSA prevention education can help Grade 7 students to learn CSA prevention knowledge and skills effectively.
关键词
中学生 /
学校健康教育 /
预防儿童性侵犯 /
知识 /
技能
Key words
students /
school health education /
child sexual abuse prevention /
knowledge /
skills
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Finkelhor D,Dziuba-Leatherman J.Victimization prevention programs:a national survey of children's exposure and reactions[J].Child Abuse Negl,1995,19(2):129-139.
[2] Briggs F,Hawkins RM.Follow-up data on the effectiveness of New Zealand's national school based child protection program[J].Child Abuse Negl,1994,18(8):635-643.
[3] MacIntyre D,Carr A,Lawlor M,et al.Development of the Stay Safe Programme[J].Child Abuse Review,2000,9(3):200-216.
[4] MacIntyre D,Carr A.Evaluation of the effectiveness of the stay safe primary prevention programme for child sexual abuse[J].Child Abuse Negl,1999,23(12):1307-1325.
[5] Mikton C,Butchart A.Child maltreatment prevention:a systematic review of reviews[J].Bull World Health Organ,2009,87(5):353-361.
[6] 陈晶琦,孔艳秋,李秀珍,等.小学二年级学生预防性侵犯知识和技能调查[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(1):12-14.
[7] 陈晶琦,杜晓娜,张曼.某农村地区小学四年级学生预防性侵犯知识和技能调查研究[J].中国性科学,2012,21(6):37-40.
[8] 陈晶琦.小学二年级学生预防性侵犯教育效果评价[J].中国学校卫生,2012,33(2):148-150.
[9] 中华人民共和国教育部制订.中小学健康教育指导纲要[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2009.
[10] Tutty LM.The revised children's knowledge of abuse questionnaire:development of a measure of children's understanding of sexual abuse prevention concepts[J].Social Work Research,1995,19(2):112-120.
[11] 陈晶琦.某市中小学学校卫生工作者预防儿童性侵犯知识态度行为调查[J].中国学校卫生,2009,30(10):876-877,880.
[12] 陈大光,陈晶琦.小学二年级学生家长预防儿童性侵犯知识调查研究[J].中国全科医学,2008,11(2B):351-354.
[13] Chen JQ,Chen DG.Awareness of child sexual abuse prevention education among parents of Grade 3 elementary school pupils in Fuxin City,China[J].Health Educ Res,2005,20(5):540-547.
[14] Telljohann SK,Everett SA,Price JH.Evaluation of a third grade sexual abuse curriculum[J].The Journal of School Health,1997,67(4):149-153.
[15] Davis MK,Gidycz CA.Child sexual abuse prevention programs:a meta-analysis[J].J Clin Child Psychol,2000,29(2):257-265.
基金
北京市教育科学“十一五”规划课题(AGA09094)
PDF(580 KB)
