目的 研究早期介入丹佛模式(ESDM)在不同病情程度孤独症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童康复中的效果。方法 选取 2018 年 2 月—2019 年 4 月在新郑市中医院就诊的ASD儿童120例,随机分为试验组与对照组各60例,每组根据美国《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM-5)病情程度分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ级,试验组采用早期介入丹佛模式治疗,对照组采用传统康复治疗。干预前及干预6个月后均采用儿童孤独症评定量表(CARS)、自闭症儿童心理教育量表第3版(PEP-3)评估康复效果。结果 干预6个月后,试验组Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级患儿CARS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=4.447、6.280,P＜0.05),试验组和对照组Ⅲ级CARS评分差异无统计学意义(t=0.159,P=0.875)。两组Ⅰ、Ⅱ级患儿在PEP-3分项目中的模仿、情感表达、社交互动、非语言行为特征干预效果比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.908、4.910、6.112、4.185,P＜0.05),但两组Ⅲ级患儿间PEP-3评分差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论 早期介入丹佛模式和常规干预模式相比,在轻中度ASD儿童中更有优势,尤其在改善ASD儿童的模仿及不良行为上(情感表达、社交活动、非语言行为特征)效果明显,在重度ASD儿童中未发现明显优势。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the effect of Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) in the rehabilitation of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with different degrees of condition. Methods A total of 120 ASD patients treated in Xinzheng Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February 2018 to April 2019 were enrolled in this study, and were randomly divided into experimental group (n=60) and control group(n=60).Children in each group was divided into grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ according to the fifth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM-5).The experimental group was treated with ESDM, while the control group was given traditional rehabilitation.Childhood Autism Rating Scale(CARS) and the Psychoeducational Profile-Third Edition(PEP-3) were used to evaluate the rehabilitation effect before intervention and six months after intervention. Results After 6 months of intervention, the CARS score of children with grade Ⅰ andⅡ ASD in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group(t=4.447, 6.280, P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the test group and the control group in the grade Ⅲ CARS scores (t=0.159, P=0.875).The scores of imitation, emotional expression, social interaction and nonverbal behavior in the PEP-3 score of children in experimental group of grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ were significantly different from those of the control group (χ2=3.908, 4.910, 6.112, 4.185, P＜0.05), butthere were no significant differences the PEP-3 scores in grade Ⅲ children between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion The ESDM model was more effective in children with mild to moderate autism compared to the conventional intervention model, especially in improving imitation, emotional expression, social activities and nonverbal behavior in children with autism, but no significant advantage is found in children with severe autism.
关键词
早期介入丹佛模式 /
孤独症谱系障碍 /
病情程度分级 /
儿童
Key words
Early Start Denver Model /
autism spectrum disorder /
severity of disease /
children
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Baio J,Wiggms L,ChnStenSen DL,et a1.Prevalerlce of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years Autism and Devdopmental Disabilities Monitoring Network,ll Sites, United States[J].MMWR Surveiu Summ,2018,67(6):1-23.
[2] 中华医学会儿科学分会发育行为学组,中国医师协会儿科分会儿童保健专业委员会,儿童孤独症诊断与防治技术和标准研究项目专家组.孤独症谱系障碍患儿常见共患问题的识别与处理原则[J].中华儿科杂志,2018,56(3):174-178.
Development Behavior Group of Pediatric Branch of Chinese Medical Association, Child Health Professional Committee of Pediatric Branch ofChinese Medical Doctor Association, Expert Group of Research Project on Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment Techniques and Standards for Children with Autism.Recognition and treatment principles of common problems of children with autism spectrum disorder[J].Chin J Pediatrics, 2018,56 (3): 174-178.(in Chinese)
[3] 曹妍,张秀文.认知神经与语言训练联合感觉统合训练对自闭症儿童语言康复的影响[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2021,19(6):477-480.
Cao Y, Zhang XW.The effect of cognitive nerve and language training combined with sensory integration training on language rehabilitation of autistic children[J].Chinese Journal of Hearing and Language Rehabilitation Science, 2021,19 (6): 477-480.(in Chinese)
[4] Dawson G.Early behavioral intervention, brain plasticity,and the prevention of autism spectrum disorder[J].Dev Psychopathol, 2008, 20(3): 775-803.
[5] 冯俊燕,李洪华,单玲, 等.维生素D3联合早期介入丹佛模式治疗幼儿孤独症谱系障碍的疗效[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2019,21(4):337-341.
Feng JY, Li HH, Shan L, et al.Vitamin D3 efficacy of early intervention combined with Denver model in the treatment of childhood autism spectrum disorder[J].Chin J Contemporary Pediatrics, 2019, 21(4): 337-341.(in Chinese)
[6] 李功迎,宋思佳,曹龙飞.精神障碍诊断与统计手册第5版解读[J].中华诊断学电子杂志,2014,2(4):310-312.
Li GY, Song SJ, Cao LF.Interpretation of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[J].Chin J Diagnostics, 2014,2 (4): 310-312.(in Chinese)
[7] 毕小彬,范晓壮,米文丽,等.ICD-11和DSM-5中孤独症谱系障碍诊断标准比较[J].国际精神病学杂志,2021,48(2):193-196.
Bi XB, Fan XZ, Mi WL, et al.Comparison of diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5[J].Int J Psychiatry,2021,48 (2): 193-196.(in Chinese)
[8] 钟霞,李维君,刘美华, 等.2种儿童孤独症行为评定量表的临床应用比较[J].南昌大学学报(医学版),2012,52(7):81-83.
Zhong X, Li WJ, Liu MH, et al.Comparison of the clinical application of two autism behavior assessment scales for children[J].J Nanchang University (Med Edition), 2012,52 (7): 81-83.(in Chinese)
[9] 于松梅.心理教育量表(PEP)中文版临床应用比较—基于内地C-PEP-3与香港PEP-3的思考[J].绥化学院学报,2021,41(10):125-129.
Yu SM.Comparison of the clinical application of the Chinese version of the Psychological Education Scale (PEP) --based on the mainland C-PEP-3 and Hong Kong PEP-3[J].J Suihua University, 2021,41(10): 125-129.(in Chinese)
[10] 胡春维,魏玉珊,孙艳萍,等.头穴针刺配合综合康复训练治疗儿童孤独症疗效观察[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(11):1328-1330.
Hu CW, Wei YH, Sun YP,et al.Observation on the effect of scalp acupuncture combined with comprehensive rehabilitation training on children with autism[J].Sou Nat Defense Med, 2016, 26 (11): 1328-1330.(in Chinese)
[11] 王金微,顾丹丹,孙岩岩, 等.早期介入丹佛模式治疗儿童孤独症谱系障碍的疗效分析[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2019,28(8):684-688.
Wang JW, Gu DD, Sun YY, et al.Analysis of the effect of early intervention in Denver mode on childhood autism spectrum disorder[J].Chin J Behavioral Med and Brain Sci, 2019, 28 (8): 684-688.(in Chinese)
[12] 李洪华,李春丽,高迪, 等.早期介入丹佛模式治疗儿童孤独症谱系障碍的初步应用[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2018,20(10):793-798.
Li HH, Li CL, Gao D, et al.Preliminary application of early intervention in Denver model to treat childhood autism spectrum disorder[J].Chin J Contemporary Pediatrics,2018, 20 (10): 793-798.(in Chinese)
[13] 张晓宇,张艳蕾.基于丹佛模式下的感觉统合训练对2～5岁孤独症谱系障碍患儿交往能力及父母育儿压力的影响[J].中国中西医结合儿科学,2022,14(1):41-44.
Zhang XY, Zhang YL.The effect of sensory integration training based onDenver model on the communication ability and parental rearing pressure of children with autism spectrum disorders aged 2-5 years[J].Chin J Paediatrics of Int Traditional and Western Med, 2022, 14 (1): 41-44.(in Chinese)
[14] 王青绸.行为分析疗法联合早期丹佛模式的教学对孤独症患儿康复的影响[J].医学理论与实践,2021,34(11):1966-1968.
Wang QC.The influence of behavior analysis therapy combined with early Denver model teaching on the rehabilitation of autistic children[J].Med Theory and Practice, 2021,34 (11): 1966-1968.(in Chinese)
[15] Vismara L,Mc Cormick C,Young G,et al.Preliminary findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism[J].Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders,2013,43(12):2953-2969.
[16] 邵小华,刘民,高超.学龄前不同阶段孤独症谱系障碍儿童接受早期介入丹佛模式的疗效分析[J].中国医学工程,2022,30(5):85-87.
Shao XH, Liu M, Gao C.Analysis of the effect of early intervention in Denver mode on preschool children with autism spectrum disorders at different stages[J].Chin Med Engineering, 2022,30 (5): 85-87.(in Chinese)
[17] Cidav Z,Muson J,Estes A,et al.Cost offset associated with early start denver model for children with autism[J].Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,2017,56(9):777-783.
[18] Eapen V,Crncec R,Walter A.Clinical outcomes of an early intervention program for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder in a community group setting[J].BMC Pediatrics,2013,13(1):1-9.
[19] 徐云,姚晶,杨健.早期介入丹佛模式在孤独症儿童早期干预中的应用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(1):188-191.
Xu Y, Yao J, Yang J.Application of early intervention Denver model in early intervention of autistic children[J].Chin J Clinical Psychology, 2017,25 (1): 188-191.(in Chinese)
[20] 于婷,高迪,张雪城,等.孤独症儿童早期介入丹佛模式的家庭治疗效果研究[J].发育医学电子杂志,2020,8(3):246-251.
Yu T, Gao D, Zhang XC, et al.Study on the effect of early interventionin Denver model of family therapy for autistic children[J].J Developmental Med, 2020,8(3): 246-251.(in Chinese)
PDF(503 KB)
