目的 探讨语种类型和年龄对学生错误记忆的影响,为进一步明确错误记忆的作用机制及影响因素提供实证依据。方法 2015年4月随机抽取潍坊市某大学、高中、初中共60名学生为被试,采用集中联想范式(DRM范式),以中、英文单词为实验材料,进行错误记忆测试。采用方差分析的方法进行结果统计。结果 1)学过项目正确再认率和关键诱饵词的错误再认率均高于无关项目的错误再认率,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);2)大学生学过项目的正确再认率高于高中生和初中生,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同语种类型的项目学习对正确再认率不存在显著影响(P>0.05);3)低年龄学生关键诱饵错误再认率显著低于高年龄学生,中文学习项目关键诱饵错误再认率高于英文学习项目,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论 随着年龄的增长,学习项目的正确再认率逐渐提高,不同语种和不同年龄对错误记忆影响显著。
Abstract
Objective To explore the effect of the language types and age on students′ false memory,in order to provide empirical evidence for further clarifying the mechanism and influencing factors of false memory . Method A total of 60 students from university,high school and junior school in Weifang were selected as subjects in April 2015.False memory test was conducted with DRM paradigm using Chinese and English words as the experimental material.Variance analysis was used get statistical results. Results 1)The correct recognition rate and the false recognition rate of critical lure were higher than those of irrelevant items(P<0.01);2) The correct recognition rate of college students was significantly higher than that of high school students and junior school students(P<0.05);There was no significant effect of learning on the correct recognition rate in different language types(P>0.05);3)The recognition rate of the critical lure of low age students was significantly lower than that of high age students(P<0.05);The false recognition rate of key bait in Chinese learning program was significantly higher than that in English learning program(P<0.05). Conclusions With the growth of age,the correct recognition rate of learning program is gradually improving,and different language and age have significant effect on false memory.
关键词
错误记忆 /
年龄阶段 /
语种类型 /
集中联想范式
Key words
false memory /
age stage /
language types /
DRM paradigm
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Jacoby LL,Rhodes MG.False remembering in the aged[J].Curr Dir Psychol Sci,2006,15(2):49-53.
[2] Carneiro P,Garcia-Marques L,Fernandez A,et al.Both associative activation and thematic extraction count,but thematic false memories are more easily rejected[J].Memory,2014,22(8):1024-1040.
[3] 江荣焕,李晓东.错误记忆的发展性逆转:为什么越长大越易“错”?[J].心理科学进展,2015,23(8):1371-1379.
[4] 黄一帆,王大华,肖红蕊,等.DRM范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制[J].心理发展与教育,2014,30(1):24-30.
[5] 毛伟宾,杨志良,王林松,等.非熟练中—英双语者跨语言的错误记忆通道效应[J].心理学报,2008,40(3):274-282.
[6] Kawasaki-Miyaji Y,Inoue T,Yama H.Cross-linguistic false recognition:How do Janpanese-dominant bilinguals process two languages:Japanese and English?[J].Psychologia,2003,46(4):255-267.
[7] 郝兴昌.DRM范式下的儿童错误记忆研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2013.
[8] Stadler MA,Rd RH,Mcdermott KB.Norms for word lists that create false memories[J].Mem Cognit,1999,27(3):494-500.
[9] 刘泽文,郭谦,葛列众.两种视觉特征提示对儿童错误记忆发展的影响[J].心理学报,2010,42(3):406-414.
[10] Brainerd CJ,Wright R,Reyna VF,et al.Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection[J].J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn,2001,27(2):307-327.
[11] Brainerd CJ,Reyna VF.Fuzzy-trace theory and memory development[J].Dev Rev,2004,24(4):396-439.
[12] Arndt J,Beato MS.The role of language proficiency in producing false memories[J].J Mem Lang,2017,95:146-158.
基金
中华医学会医学教育分会资助项目(2012-xl-19);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2015CL027)