目的 从依恋理论的视角对南京市区经济文化水平条件下独生子女与非独生子女的依恋特点进行分析。方法 利用2010-2013年调查的南京市区正常儿童一般情况调查表与青少年依恋问卷资料,对99名独生子女与87名非独生子女的问卷结果进行比较,分析两组儿童的依恋特点,以及父母文化程度、性别、不同年龄阶段对依恋特点的影响。结果 独生子女组家庭依恋亲和性、消极性、依赖性、焦虑性,朋友依恋亲和性、消极性、依赖性、焦虑性得分与非独生子女组差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。父母文化程度、性别、不同年龄阶段对独生子女与非独生子女青少年依恋问卷各因子影响无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论 南京市区独生子女与非独生子女的依恋特征相同。父母文化程度、性别、不同年龄阶段对独生子女与非独生子女的依恋特征无影响。
Abstract
Objective To describe the difference of attachment characteristics between only-child and non-only-child under the current level of economy and culture in Nanjing. Methods Based on data from the investigation of the normal children in Nanjing from 2010 to 2013,this paper made a comparative study on the data of the general demographic questionnaire and the Adolescent Attachment Inventory between 99 only-child students and 87 non-only-child students. Results There was no significant difference in scores of family attachment and friends attachment between only-child group and non-only-child group (P>0.05).The influence of parents' education degree,children's genders,age did not have significant influence on scores of family attachment and friends attachment between only-child group and non-only-child group (P>0.05). Conclusion Under the current level of economy and culture in Nanjing,the attachment characteristics between only-child and non-only-child are alike.The attachment characteristics between only-child and non-only-child with different education of their parents,different gender or age stages is similar.
关键词
独生子女 /
依恋 /
青少年依恋问卷
Key words
only child /
attachment /
the Adolescent Attachment Inventory
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 肖福兰,张其博.关于小学独生子女教育情况的调查(上)[J].人口与经济,1982,4(1):43-46,55.
[2] 万传文,范存仁,林国斌.五岁至七岁独生与非独生子女某些个性特征的比较及性别差异的研究[J].心理学报,1984(4):383-390.
[3] 黄鹂.独生子女与非独生子女个性特征无显著差异[J].安徽大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1994,35(3):90-95.
[4] 魏俊彪.高中学生心理健康状况及其影响因素调查[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2007,13(4):347-349.
[5] 刘春梅,陈一心,张宁.亲子依恋研究新进展[J].中国儿童保健杂志2012,20(7):610-612.
[6] 刘曦,张建新.青少年依恋理论建构及问卷修订[J].中国临床心理卫生杂志,2007:339-340.
[7] 刘娜,刘希平.亲子依恋质量的影响因素及启示[J].社会心理科学,2007(Z1):229-235.
[8] De Wolfe MS,Van ljzendoom MH.Sensitivity and attachment:a meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment[J].Child Development,1997,68:571-591.
[9] 安芹,影响儿童依恋风格形成的家庭因素[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2001.9(4):312-315.
[10] 高爽,初中生依恋与人际信任的关系及干预研究[D].开封:河南大学,2014.
[11] 王相菊.独生子女与非独生子女父母教养方式的对照研究[J].中国民康医学杂志,2005,17(9):535-536.
[12] 刘宝花,黄悦勤,刘肇瑞.北京市高一学生父母养育方式的现况调查[J].中国学校卫生,2003,24(4):328-330.
[13] 朱正丰,周守珍.大学生父母教养方式调查研究[J].四川文理学院学报(自然科学),2009,19(2):70-72.
[14] 何玲,陈图农,陈一心,等.独生子女依恋与父母依恋的关系[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2012,21 (7):641-643.
[15] 张咏梅,青少年依恋及与人际信任的关系研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2006.
[16] 安晶卉,张建新,王黎.青少年依恋问卷初步编制[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(11):760-762.
[17] 莎伦.布雷姆,罗兰.米勒,丹尼尔.珀尔曼等.亲密关系[M].郭辉,肖斌,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2005:213-219.
[18] Main M,Kaplan N,Cassidy J.Security in infancy,childhood,and adulthood:A move to the level of representation[J].Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,1985,50 (1/2):66-104.
[19] 王争艳,刘迎泽,杨叶.依恋内部工作模式的研究概述及探讨[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(5):629-639.
PDF(580 KB)
