目的 探讨留守儿童健康危险行为的易感性及其家庭环境因素, 为其健康保健提供科学依据。方法 采用青少年健康相关危险行为问卷(Adolescent Health Related Risky Behavior Inventory, AHRBI)和中文版家庭环境量表(Family Environmental Scale-Chinese Version, FES-CV)对178名留守儿童和132名农村非留守儿童进行了测查。结果 1)留守儿童和农村非留守儿童在暴力攻击行为(F=9.320)、破坏纪律行为(F=8.961)、自杀自残行为(F=10.911)和健康妥协行为(F=9.144)四个因子上的差异均有高度统计学意义(P均<0.01);2)家庭环境可以预测留守儿童健康危险行为94%的变异, 其因果结构模型的适配度指标为χ2=40.396, RMSEA=0.047, GFI=0.961, NFI=0.933, PCFI=0.516。结论 留守儿童是健康危险行为的易感人群, 家庭环境是留守儿童健康危险行为发生的重要影响因素。
Abstract
Objective To explore the vulnerability of health risk behavior in left-behind children and its relationship with family environment. Methods A total of 310 children, including 178 left-behind children and 132 non-left-behind children were surveyed by Adolescent Health Related Risky Behavior Inventory (AHRBI) and Family Environmental Scale-Chinese Version (FES-CV). Results The left-behind children got more scores than the non-left-behind children in aggression and violence (F=9.320), rule broken (F=8.961), suicide and self-injury (F=10.911) and health-compromising behaviors (F=9.144), The differences had significiance (P all<0.01.2) Family environment of left-behind children could predict 94% variance of their health risk behavior, the structural equation modeling fitting analysis was brought outχ2=40.396, RMSEA=0.047, GFI=0.961, NFI=0.933, PCFI=0.516. Conclusion The left-behind children are most severely vulnerable to health risk behavior, and family environment is an important influencing factor of health risk behavior.
关键词
留守儿童 /
健康危险行为 /
家庭环境
Key words
left-behind children /
health risk behavior /
family environment
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Herrenkoh TI, Kosterman R, Mason WA, et al.Effects of childhood conduct problems and family adversity on health, health behaviors, and service use in early adulthood:Tests of developmental pathways involving adolescent risk taking and depression[J].Development and Psychopathology, 2010, 22(S3):655-665.
[2] 佘凌, 罗国芬.留守儿童心理学研究述评[J].河南大学学报:社会科学版, 2009, 49(6):137-146.
[3] 罗静, 王薇, 高文斌.中国留守儿童研究述评[J].心理科学进展, 2009, 17(5):990-995.
[4] Brooks FM, Magnusson J, Spencer N, et al.Adolescent multiple risk behaviour:an asset approach to the role of family, school and community[J].Journal of Public Health, 2012, 34(S):i48-i56.
[5] 赵兰, 唐娟, 李科生.留守未成年犯攻击性与社会支持家庭亲密度和适应性的相关研究[J].中国临床心理学, 2011, 19(6):790-791.
[6] 王孟成, 蚁金瑶, 蔡琳, 等.青少年健康相关危险行为问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(4):287-292.
[7] 费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 等.“家庭亲密度和适应性量表”和“家庭环境量表”的初步评价-正常家庭与精神分裂症家庭成员对照研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志, 1991, 5(5):198-203.
[8] 李光友, 罗太敏, 陶方标.父母外出打工对留守儿童危险行为和心理因素影响[J].中国公共卫生, 2012, 28(7):924-926.
[9] 刘小先.留守儿童人格特征与心理行为问题关系分析[J].中国学校卫生, 2011, 32(5):615-616.
基金
全国教育科学“十二五”规划课题(BKA120087);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(12YBA037, 11YBB0194)。
PDF(433 KB)
